Michel Bauwens of the P2P Foundation argues in his blog of 12 July 2011 (http://bit.ly/oC7XzI ) that all three main organs of society (civil, private and state) are profoundly challenged by the SoMe driven networked society into which we have moved. Some examples from the post:
"civil society is the locus of the shared abundance of value creation, and the place for the continual dialogue regarding the necessities of common life"
"we participate in the value creation, either as free voluntary contributors, or as members of a new type of private sector organisation,"
"Under conditions of peer production, design and innovation moves to commons-based communitiies, which lack the incentive for unsustainable design; products are inherently designed for sustainability, and the production process itself is designed for openness and distribution."
"communities should create new entrepreneurial forms.......and themselves should create mission-oriented, community supportive, sustainability-oriented corporate forms, that operate in the marketplace but do not themselves reproduce capitalism."
What I understand Michel to be saying is that in the new networked world, community is fundamental to every aspect of our lives. The post talks about the characteristics he believes each of the traditional sectors of society will have as the new order develops.
I would raise a different suggestion - that in our emerging new world, fuelled by wirearchies and the proliferation of tools and platfoprms all opearting from the "let's get connected" assumption, the traditional societal sectors will become blurred and in the end will be a sub-set of a re-emergence of community - but in a much less structured more fluid, more instant form than we have so far known.
I have been struck by the Arab Spring, in which a new sense of community was born almost overnight at national level. I was struck by the assertion of a young Ghanaian delegate at e-Learning Africa in May that the power of SoMe will ensure that universities, reluctant to engage in Open Educational Resources (OER), will be forced to open themselves and become transparent. In UK this very day, the outrage felt by ordinary people and gathered together partly at least through the SoMe has resulted in the Murdoch empire's being forced to revise its business plan for media domination. There are many more large and small examples that could be quoted.
Maybe one that should be highlighted to end this post is that of the organisation that refused to open the SoMe to its employees - and found itself with a virtual community of those same employees empowering themsleves to do their work - but outside of the organisations' direct sphere of influence. There was only one solution - to embrace the change and develop the new sense of community to the benefit of business and the individual.
The sooner our enterprises cease to resist a change that has happened in global society, and begin to draw upon the strength of social learning, the sooner our world will become more integrated and mutually supportive
Showing posts with label "Informal communities" community benefits". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "Informal communities" community benefits". Show all posts
Wednesday, 13 July 2011
Wednesday, 6 July 2011
Community - an important component of performance support
The growing understanding that L&D's prime role in the second decade of the century is as a highly specialised and potent performance support function makes it important for us to undertsand how that support happens. Don Taylor has written quite brillinatly about this in the Training Zone (http://www.trainingzone.co.uk/topic/strategy/four-things-ld-must-do-stay-relevant-part-4-performance-support/160973). However is there something missing? What is the factor that will power the move of L&D into its true role in the business? Allison Rossett writes about the convergence of learning and work at http://edweb.sdsu.edu/Courses/ED795A/key1/Rossett_Schafer_aboutPST.pdf
Improving performance always means implementing change, and with change always comes risk, insecurity and some degree of resistance. The means to overcoming the inevitable lack of confidence, hesitancy, and unwillingness to take initiative that ensue is well documented as helping people find a new and comfortable place to be, supporting them with answers to questions, providing information, enabling new skills, encouraging experimentation, allowing failure and other points on a check-list. It is only when people begin to regain confidence that performance will improve and individuals will reach out for new and challenging targets.
So what is the role of community in performance support?
Improving performance always means implementing change, and with change always comes risk, insecurity and some degree of resistance. The means to overcoming the inevitable lack of confidence, hesitancy, and unwillingness to take initiative that ensue is well documented as helping people find a new and comfortable place to be, supporting them with answers to questions, providing information, enabling new skills, encouraging experimentation, allowing failure and other points on a check-list. It is only when people begin to regain confidence that performance will improve and individuals will reach out for new and challenging targets.
So what is the role of community in performance support?
- A place where people are able to find comfort - whether out of common need, fear, or interest, or whether out of a sense of adventure, or even an understanding of the need to carry the whole along and thus help one another
- A place to retreat to and share feelings, needs, anxieties and to ask questions of others experience,
- A place into which to adventure to express ideas, share and validate insights
- A place where those who "can" help others with knowledge, experience and affirmation
- A place of discovery, where energy is gained to push and cross boundaries
- Our quest for performance support in our connected world of wierarchies means that almst anywhere we look (for help, experience, ideas, experience) we interface with and join (even if only sign up and gain access!) to networks. In many cases these are groupings of people who don't know one another and who only come together out of common context or content.
- In joining networks we become unconsciously part of communities - in which we readily empathise with others we find there, where we are able to explore ideas dispassionately and maybe even to disagree vehemently
- In our quest for that essential comfort zone we experience another kind of discomfort in joining an unfamiliar technology, new and anonymous people, an unwritten code of practice about the rules of the community.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)